1Chapter 12
فصل (١٢)
Ghāyat al-Ḥakīm · draft
Counsels and learned points
Ritter pp. 282–285 · 18 passages
1Chapter 12
فصل (١٢)
2And know, O investigator, that the work brings out what is hidden in the sciences, and by it doubts are resolved, for when knowledge of what is sought is attained, doubts are resolved. And for that reason Abū Bishr Mattā ibn Yūnus mentioned, at the beginning of his commentary on the second treatise of the Book of the Metaphysics of Aristotle, when he mentioned what befell Anūshirwān, king of the Persians, with Mazdak, who had contrived a stratagem by which it would be made to appear that he was a prophet,
واعلم ايها الباحث ان العمل يخرج مكنون العلوم وبه تنحلّ الشكوك فانه عند حصول معرفة المطلوب تنحلّ الشكوك، ولذلك ما ذكر «ابو بشر متى بن يونس» فى اول تفسيره للمقالة الثانية من «كتاب ما بعد الطبيعة لارسطاطاليس» عند ذكره لما اتفق لانوشروان ملك الفرس مع مزدك الذى كان قد صنع حيلة يُرى بها انه نبىّ
'amal ('work') here in the sense of practical work as opposed to theory. Kitāb mā ba'd al-ṭabī'a, lit. 'the Book of what is after Nature'.
3and that was by his setting up a fire-temple and making beneath it a place which he built with a fine construction out of things on which fire has no effect at all, such as talc and the like among the stones prepared for that. And he would put a man into that place, and he himself would stand with whomever he wished facing the fire and would address the fire, and it would address him as he addressed it and answer him according to what he wished; and it was the person who was speaking, not the fire.
وذلك بأن نصب بيت نار وجعل اسفله موضعًا بناه بناءً لطيفًا باشياء لا تؤثّر فيها النار شيئًا كالطلق وشبهه من الحجارة المعدّة لذلك وكان يدخل فى ذلك الموضع انسانًا ويقف هو مع من شاء بازاء النار ويخاطب النار فتخاطبه كخطابه وتجاوبه على ما يريده وكان الشخصُ المتكلمَ لا النار
bayt nār, lit. 'house of fire', i.e. a Zoroastrian fire-temple.
4When Anūshirwān heard this, he found it strange, and his astonishment brought him to the point that he wished to investigate it. So he demanded of him that he show him that, and he stood him beside himself. When he heard the speech from the fire he was perplexed; then he aimed an arrow towards the place of the speech, and the arrow struck that man hidden beneath the grating. Then the perplexity ceased and the doubt was resolved, and it became clear to him that that speech had not belonged to the fire.
فلما سمع انوشروان هذا استغربه وبلغ به من العجب ما اراد البحث عنه فطالبه ان يُرِيَهُ ذلك فاوقفه معه فلما سمع الكلام من النار تحيّر ثم انه سدّد سهمًا نحو موضع الكلام فصادف السهم ذلك الرجل المختبئ تحت الشباك فزالت الحيرة وانحلّ الشك وتبيّن له ان ذلك الكلام لم يكن للنار،
5Abū Bishr did not mention this in the way I have mentioned it; rather, I saw it related in full in the Reports of India. So be sparing, O reader, with what I have mentioned to you, and be trustworthy over it, and be, at [as is] expected of you in restraining the soul from passion. And fear the station of your Lord the Exalted, and make your passion [directed] toward His presence. For the passion of the soul is the withdrawal of the soul toward the beloved and its inclination toward it with its whole [being]. If its beloved and its object of ardent love is toward the holy divine presence and the lordly providence, then the passion is praiseworthy; and if it is toward the perishing bodies, then it is a blameworthy aim,
ولم يذكر هذا «ابو بشر» بمثل ما ذكرته بل رأيته فى «اخبار الهند» مستقصًى فكن بما ذكرته لك ايها الناظر ضنينًا وعليه امينًا وكن عند الظنّ بك فى منع النفس عن الهوى وخف مقام ربّك تعالى واجعل هواك نحو حضرته فان هوى النفس هو انعزال النفس الى المحبوب وميلها بكليتها اليه فان كان محبوبه ومعشوقه نحو الحضرة الالهية المقدّسة والعناية الربّانية فالهوى محمود وان كان نحو الاجسام الفانيات فهو غرض مذموم
Akhbār al-Hind, 'Reports of India', taken as a book title as Ritter's quotation marks indicate. hawā is rendered 'passion' throughout this passage.
6because the way of passion is the way of love. And love is divided: of it is a love of [reading uncertain: istīmāl] and veneration, like the love of God the Exalted and the love of fathers and teachers; and of it is a love of tenderness, like the love of children; and of it is a love of benefit, like the love of people at large and of the other things from which benefit is obtained.
لأن الهوى طريقه طريق المحبّة والمحبّة تنقسم فمنها محبّة استيمال وتعظيم مثل محبّة الله تعالى ومحبّة الآباء والمعلّمين ومنها محبّة شفقة مثل محبّة الابناء ومنها محبّة منفعة كمحبّة جملة الناس وسائر الامور التى تنال منها منفعة،
7And when love is excessive it is called ardent love and passion; and passion, when it is for other than God, is the worst object of worship that was ever worshipped. May God the Exalted illuminate your heart toward what pleases Him, with an expansion from Him toward knowledge of Him. And with this, guard yourself against the common people and the ignorant among the elite, and do not acquaint any one of them with a secret of your secrets, for they are worse than ravening beasts, and they are the killers of the prophets.
واذا افرطت المحبّة سُميت عشقًا وهوًى والهوى اذا كان فى غير الله كان شرّ معبودٍ عُبِدَ، والله تعالى ينير قلبك الى ما يرضاه بانشراح منه الى معرفته ومع هذا فتحفّظْ من العوامّ والجهلة من الخواصّ ولا تطلع منهم احدًا على سرّ من اسرارك فهم شرّ من السباع العادية وهم قتلة الانبياء،
8And I mention to you what I saw of Abū Bishr Mattā in the commentary on the first treatise of the Book of Metaphysics of Aristotle, where he mentioned the riddles, at Aristotle's saying: 'It is incumbent upon us to study the matter of the laws and the riddles.' Abū Bishr said: The extent of the power of custom and its greatness becomes clear from the matter of the laws, and from them one infers the power of custom, for we have become accustomed to proverbs and fables from our childhood.
وأذكر لك ما رأيت «لابى بشر متّى» فى شرح المقالة الاولى من «كتاب ما بعد الطبيعة لارسطاطاليس» اذ ذكر الالغاز عند قول ارسطو يجب علينا النظر فى امر النواميس والالغاز فقال «ابو بشر» مبلغ قوة العادة وعظمها يتبيّن من امر النواميس ويستدل منها على قوة العادة فان الامثال والخرافات قد اعتدناها من صغرنا
Abū Bishr Mattā ibn Yūnus. al-nawāmīs: religious laws. The passage commented on corresponds to Metaphysics α 3, 995a, on the force of habit shown by the laws.
9Then he said: The riddles that are in the laws, when they are considered from the side of demonstration, are like fables, because no demonstration stands for them, rather [it stands] for their contrary; and when they are considered from the side of the aims of those who laid them down, they are found to be noble, and their great benefit is found in this: if they were removed, how would the ravening of the beasts be — and they are the majority of those in the world, rather all of them except the rare exception — until they destroy tillage and offspring and annihilate the intellect!
ثم قال ان الالغاز التى فى النواميس اذا نظر فيها من جهة البرهان كانت كالخرافات لأنها لا يقوم عليها برهان بل على نقيضها واذا نظر فيها من جهة اغراض واضعيها وجدت شريفة ويوجد عظيم نفعها بأن لو ارتفعت كيف كان يكون تكالب السباع وهم اكثر من فى العالم بل كلهم الا الشاذّ النادر حتى يهلكوا الحرث والنسل ويبيدوا العقل
'Tillage and offspring' (al-ḥarth wa-l-nasl) is a Qur'anic phrase (2:205).
10And if it is incumbent upon us to thank a father who begot us, how much more fittingly ought we to thank those who laid down the riddles, by which is the survival of our life and the preservation of our intellects, together with the existence of the sustaining cause for us.
واذا وجب علينا شكر ابٍ ولدنا فكم بالحرى ينبغى ان نشكر واضعى الالغاز التى بها بقاء حياتنا وحفظ عقولنا مع وجود السبب الممسك لنا،
'Cause' here renders sabab (al-sabab al-mumsik); 'illa is also rendered 'cause' below.
11And that is, O reader, that in natural bodies there is a certain power by which they remain preserving their forms and their actions, not shifting from that nor exchanging it, for a certain period, with a particularity for each one of them. The naturalists call this power the sustaining cause, and by it is the persistence of bodies: they do not fall apart, nor [word uncertain: tatahayya'a], nor turn to lime, for a certain period, but remain in their state and their continuity. And it is what is expressed among them by 'nature'.
وذلك ايها الناظر ان فى الاجسام الطبيعية قوة مّا بها تبقى حافظة لصورها وافعالها غير منتقلة عن ذلك ولا متبدّلة به مدّة مّا بخصوصية لكل واحد منها ويسمّى الطبيعيون هذه القوة السبب الممسك وبها بقاء الاجسام لا تتهافت ولا تتهيّأ ولا تتكلّس مدّة مّا لكن تبقى على حالها واتصالها وهى المعبّر عنها عندهم بالطبيعة
tatahayya'a ('become disposed') does not suit the context; perhaps read tatahabba'a, 'turn to dust'.
12And nature, may God honour you, is among the things whose knowledge is necessary. Its definition is that it is a first principle, by essence, for every soul and plant [that is] essential [sense uncertain]; like the stone, for example: when it falls downward, it does not fall because of its being a body, since the other bodies differ from it in that; so it is by a meaning [by which it] differs from fire, which extends upward. That meaning, then, is a principle for this kind of motion, and it is called nature. And motion itself is sometimes called nature: one says 'the nature of the stone is falling'; and one sometimes says 'the nature of the element' and 'the essential forms'.
والطبيعة اكرمك الله ممّا يجب معرفتها وحدّها انها مبدأ اول بالذات لكل نفس ونبات ذاتى كالحجر مثلًا اذا هوى الى اسفل فليس يهوى لكونه جسمًا اذ يفارقه فيه سائر الاجسام فهو بمعنى يفارق النار التى تمتدّ الى فوق فذلك المعنى مبدأ لهذا النوع من الحركة ويسمّى طبيعة وقد تسمّى نفس الحركة طبيعة يقال طبيعة الحجر الهوى وقد يقال طبيعة العنصر والصور الذاتية،
lī-kull nafs wa-nabāt dhātī is probably a corruption of the Aristotelian definition of nature as a principle of motion and rest in that in which it is essentially; translated as printed.
13And the physicians apply the name of nature to the temperament, to the innate heat, to the configurations of the members, to the motions and to the soul, and each one of these has a definition. In reality it is an equivocal name, said of the living, of what is proper to a thing, of the humours, of the world, of heaven, and of the power which the Creator, mighty and majestic, made a cause for the effecting of generation and corruption and of motion and rest in every moving and resting thing.
والاطبّاء يطلقون اسم الطبيعة على المزاج وعلى الحرارة الغريزية وعلى هيئات الاعضاء وعلى الحركات وعلى النفس ولكل واحد منها حدّ وعلى الحقيقة انها اسم مشترك يقال على الحىّ وعلى ما هو خاصّ بشىء وعلى الكيموسات وعلى العالم وعلى السماء وعلى القوة التى صيّرها البارئ عزّ وجلّ علّةً لتأثير الكون والفساد والحركة والسكون فى كل متحرك وساكن
al-kaymūsāt: the humours (Greek chymoi).
14For that reason the ancients defined it as the beginning of motion and rest. And the Philosopher also defined it as a corporeal form, and [said] that it comes to be in the body through the mediation of the sphere between it and the soul. And Plato also defined it, saying that nature is a natural substance that makes firm the crafting of things. And Galen defined it with a technical definition, and said that it is heat innate, sustaining the body, warding off corruption from it according to the measure of its power, and it is for it the right ordering of nourishment and of other things. And Empedocles said of nature: a simple substance having one form, that is, it receives the forms form by form, that is, a form after the passing away of a form, and does not receive them together. And he also said: nature has in it the power of life, except that it is the form of life, just as the boy is a craftsman of all the crafts potentially, and when he goes out into whichever of them he goes out into and is trained in it, he is a craftsman actually.
ولذلك حدّها الاوائل بأنها ابتداء حركة وسكون وحدّها الفيلسوف ايضًا بأنها صورة جسمية وانها تكون فى البدن بتوسّط الفلك فيما بينها وبين النفس وحدّها «افلاطون» ايضًا بأن قال ان الطبيعة جوهر طبيعى محكم لصنعة الاشياء، وحدّها «جالينوس» بحدّ صناعى وقال انها حرارة غريزية مقوّمة للبدن دافعة عنه الفساد على نحو قوتها وهى له مصلحة الغذاء وغيره، وقال «بندقليس» للطبيعة جوهر بسيط ذو صورة واحدة اى تقبل الصور صورةً صورةً اى صورةً بعد فناء صورة ولا تقبلها مجتمعة، وقال ايضا الطبيعة فيها قوة الحياة الا انها صورة الحياة كما ان الصبىّ صانع للصناعات كلها بالقوة فاذا خرج فيما خرج منها وتدرّب فيه كان صانعًا بالفعل،
'The Philosopher' (al-faylasūf) presumably means Aristotle. 'Empedocles' renders Bandaqlīs. 'said of nature' renders li-l-ṭabī'a, literally 'to/for nature [is] a simple substance'.
15We have only presented you with these rare gifts so that this may be a cause of the kindling of your knowledge, so that you may be one who keeps in mind the causes of things. For the sage Empedocles said that the causes of the substances are four: a cause that is neither by potentiality nor by act but above both; a cause potentially whose effect is actually; a cause actually whose effect is potentially; and a cause actually whose effect is actually. These, then, are the causes of the substances, as when we say: the Will, the intellect, the soul, nature and the element.
انما اتحفناك بهذه التحف ليكون ذلك سببًا لانقداح معرفتك كى تكون حافظًا لعلل الاشياء، فقد قال الحكيم «بندقليس» ان علل الجواهر اربع علة لا تكون بقوة ولا بفعل بل فوقهما وعلة بالقوة ومعلولها بالفعل وعلة بالفعل ومعلولها بالقوة وعلة بالفعل ومعلولها بالفعل، فهذه علل الجواهر كقولنا الارادة والعقل والنفس والطبيعة والعنصر
sabab ('cause') and 'illa ('cause') both appear here; sabab is used in the general sense 'a means/cause of the kindling'. 'element' renders al-'unṣur.
16So the Will is, in relation to God, potentially, and in relation to the intellect, actually; and the intellect is, in relation to the Will, potentially, and in relation to the soul, actually; and the soul is, in relation to the intellect, potentially, and in relation to nature, actually; and nature is, in relation to the soul, potentially, and in relation to the element, actually. So each one of these substances is a cause for what is above it potentially and for what is beneath it actually, and an effect for what is above it actually and for what is beneath it potentially; and it pours forth the excellences upon what is beneath it and receives them from what is above it, an outpouring after an outpouring and a receiving after a receiving.
فالارادة عند الله بالقوة وعند العقل بالفعل والعقل عند الارادة بالقوة وعند النفس بالفعل والنفس عند العقل بالقوة وعند الطبيعة بالفعل والطبيعة عند النفس بالقوة وعند العنصر بالفعل فكل واحد من هذه الجواهر علة لما فوقه بالقوة ولما تحته بالفعل ومعلول لما فوقه بالفعل ولما تحته بالقوة ومفيض الفضائل على ما تحته وقابلها عما فوقه فيضًا بعد فيض وقبولًا بعد قبول،
'inda llāh: 'in relation to God'.
17And they have four other causes, intermediate between the accidental and the substantial, and these are the causes of the purposes; and they are inquiry, ascent [reading uncertain: al-ruqī, ascent, or al-ruqā, incantations], love, and that which acts from its own essence. So inquiry is for the spiritual things which nature has not seen to manifesting [sense uncertain]; ascent is for the artificial and natural things; and love and that which acts from its own essence are for both together. And all of them go back to love. And God the Exalted is the Giver of the complete outpouring to all things, first and last, glory be to Him, and may He be exalted.
ولها علل اخر اربع متوسّطة بين العرضية والجوهرية وهى علل الاغراض وهى البحث والرقى والمحبة والذى يفعل من ذاته فالبحث للاشياء الروحانية التى لم تغن الطبيعة باظهارها والرقى للاشياء الصناعية والطبيعية والمحبة والذى يفعل من ذاته لهما معًا وكلها راجع الى المحبّة والله تعالى هو المعطى الفيض التام لجميع الاشياء اولًا وآخرًا سبحانه وتعالى
al-aghrāḍ ('purposes') may be intended as al-a'rāḍ ('accidents'), given the contrast 'araḍiyya / jawhariyya. lam tughni l-ṭabī'a bi-iẓhārihā is obscure.
18And since we have reached this end, let us make that the end of this book.
واذ قد وصلنا الى هذه الغاية فلنجعل ذلك آخر هذه المقالة.